The contract, apparently used generally by the defendant, assigned to a salesman a 'territory', consisting not of a geographical area but of certain enumerated customer accounts. The plaintiff was employed by the defendant as a salesman under a written contract terminable at will, without cause, by either party. 1 We summarize the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff. The only question we find it necessary to reach is whether the defendant's motion for a directed verdict was properly denied. The defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $45,649.62. ![]() ![]() ![]() By count three he seeks recovery in the same amount on a quantum meruit for the fair value of services which allegedly gave rise to the bonuses. Arnold Lundwall, Wellesley, with him), for plaintiff.īefore HALE, C.J., and GOODMAN, GRANT, and ARMSTRONG, JJ.īy the first two counts of the plaintiff's amended declaration, he seeks recovery of certain bonuses claimed to be due him under a written contract with the defendant, his former employer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |